Folding Cards

Come on. I mean, seriously.

5 comments… add one

  • I can’t chime in yet – too many conflicting images of both apocalypse and ecstasy.

    SF October 27, 2004, 10:59 am
  • What happened to all of that crap about how impossible an 0-3 comeback might be? Don’t like it when the shoe’s on the other foot. Typical!

    YF October 27, 2004, 11:13 am
  • You have to brush up your reading comprehension skills. I NEVER said such a comeback was impossible. Improbable? Yes. Unlikely? Sure. IT WAS BOTH OF THOSE.
    It still stands that such a comeback, however improbable, could happen for the Cardinals as well, and as a Sox fan (especially as a Sox fan) I am entitled to both of my visions.
    Please rescind your attack.

    SF October 27, 2004, 11:19 am
  • The Cards are indeed a surprise, not that I’m complaining. At what point do you look to LaRussa?
    And while I’m not a believer in “destiny” or the like, when your two best defensive plays are turned in by Papi and Sloppy…well, you start to wonder.

    MJL (SF) October 27, 2004, 12:01 pm
  • This St. Louis performance (or lack thereof) might go down as one of the worst WS efforts ever. I mean, if Wakefield doesn’t walk like twenty guys in a row in Game 1, that game isn’t even close, and the Cards didn’t sniff Schilling/Pedro/DLowe. Not even a little bit. Skull-clutcher baserunning blunders, their supposed MVP-troika batting a collective .133, never getting a lead, for Pete’s sake. The Sox were hot, for sure, but weren’t the Cards also, coming off the NLCS? What the hell happened? What a bizarre postseason this has been. But I don’t know how much of this you can put on LaRussa b/c his guys simply didn’t peform.

    Spidey October 28, 2004, 1:41 am

Leave a Comment