Josh Beckett Suspended

MLB has suspended Josh Beckett for six games for his unpleasant facial hair role in the bench-clearing incident in Anaheim. 

17 comments… add one
  • do you think they could also suspend wang???

    YF April 14, 2009, 3:17 pm
  • Couldnt have happened to a nicer person…

    sam-YF April 14, 2009, 3:20 pm
  • Saw it on ESPN – their writeup makes it seems like he deserved it. Nearly beaning Abreu during a timeout and was pretty aggressive about it, considering..

    Lar April 14, 2009, 3:24 pm
  • Rediculous. I said it for Joba, and I say it now.

    Brad April 14, 2009, 3:35 pm
  • Agreed with Brad, especially since Beckett wasn’t even thrown from the game.

    AndrewYF April 14, 2009, 3:40 pm
  • And why six games? As though they thought the extra game on top of his rotation stint would really show him? Fuck off, MLB. Next time, it’ll be a pitcher suspended 4 games for implying he’ll pitch inside.

    Hit Dog April 14, 2009, 3:54 pm
  • Should have gone ahead and hit him. Couldn’t hurt anyone with that size head anyway

    bso April 14, 2009, 4:06 pm
  • this season has “Hindenburg” written all over it.

    SF April 14, 2009, 4:28 pm
  • I don’t get this – the crew chief, Joe West, said he didn’t think there was any intent behind Beckett’s throw, that it wasn’t even worth a warning if benches hadn’t cleared, but Bob Watson determines there was intent, so Beckett gets a stiff suspension AND a fine? Watson is basically saying that he knows what happened with more authority than the umpire running the game, the guy who had to deal with all the stuff on the field and who probably heard a bunch of jabber on the field that Watson didn’t.
    I am not interested in complaining about victimization here, and if Beckett needs to sit then so be it, but I am really curious to know the standards with which Watson judges “intent”, how he is able to override a crew chief with such certainty, and if he will be able to apply his own standards fairly over the course of the season for every instance where a ball sails near someone’s head. I am skeptical.
    West’s quote:
    “Did he throw it up and in? Yeah. Do we believe he threw it at Abreu? No. Would we have warned him had both benches not emptied? Probably not, but because both benches emptied, we did issue a warning,” explained West.

    SF April 14, 2009, 5:02 pm
  • I’m not saying I agree with the suspension, but watching the replays (and not the game, so feel free to correct me) Beckett was being unnecessary provocative. You shouldn’t be suspended for being an asshole, but he seemed like he was going after it after people were already trying to settle down.
    Also, the post-game comment about Angels being emotional might or might not be correct, but definitely not really the thing to say..

    Lar April 14, 2009, 5:04 pm
  • But ya, 6 games appealed to 5 games, say, and he probably won’t miss a start if there was a doubleheader in between or something. An extra day off (or two)..

    Lar April 14, 2009, 5:05 pm
  • I’m pretty sure Watson is suspending him for provocation, not for throwing at Abreu’s head.

    AndrewYF April 14, 2009, 5:38 pm
  • Suspended six games for being an ass? Seems like a lot of MLB players ought to be missing a lot of games this season.

    rootbeerfloat April 14, 2009, 6:54 pm
  • I hope tomorrow I’m not issued a citation for almost speeding on my way to work…Or I hope I don’t get an added fee for almost being late at the library.
    It’s exactly the same thing. No difference whatsoever.

    Brad April 14, 2009, 7:09 pm
  • “I’m pretty sure Watson is suspending him for provocation, not for throwing at Abreu’s head.”
    That’s my take, too. And I agree with it.
    It’ll get trimmed.

    I'mBillMcNeal April 14, 2009, 7:17 pm
  • Being suspended for provocation is an awfully slippery slope. Best of luck to Watson being equitable working that beat all season.

    SF April 14, 2009, 8:22 pm
  • He was suspended for igniting the bench clearing incident by approaching Abreu when he should have just stayed on the mound. When you throw up and in and then approach the player, intent is easy to determine, even if the ump didn’t have a clue. If the ump had ejected Beckett when he approached the plate like he should have, there would likely be no suspension because the benches wouldn’t have cleared.
    Beckett’s a Bozo, I back it up with facts at my blog: http://ethicalsportsfan.blogspot.com/.

    Daniel April 16, 2009, 8:48 am

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.