The Red Sox Get Queer

They’re here, they’re Queer, and the Tivo is set. Be prepared for a rash of homophobic insults from insecure Yankees fans everywhere (though not on this site, I hope), but we’re proud of our team for their sense of humor and hopefully their new sense of style. Perhaps Carson and Jai can help straighten out Alan Embree and Keith Foulke, pun absolutely intended.

14 comments… add one
  • Man, I can’t freeking wait to see that. And like you said, its just awesome that the Sox have such a great sense of humor. I honestly think that there are quite a few Yankees players/fans who wish their organization was more like the Sox. It must get old being miserable pricks under a horrendous owner.

    Bill June 5, 2005, 9:36 pm
  • Did they show it already when was it?

    JCacho June 6, 2005, 12:39 am
  • It’s on Tuesday night at 10, I think. On Bravo, obviously.

    Laura June 6, 2005, 6:05 am
  • Am I homophobic, if I am against SODOMISTS being publically supported by the Boston Red Sox for their support of Little League? Didn’t we just have a scandal in Boston over SODOMISTS in the Catholic Church sodomizing young Boys? And the Red Sox support MORE of this? I think the Red Sox should stay far away from anything to do with deviant relationships with young boys.

    john June 6, 2005, 9:14 am
  • gosh, that didn’t take long. SF – get thee to Vegas, your numbers are up! I’d go off on “john” but whats the point? anything I say will inevitably be misinterpreted and/or misunderstood.
    “john,” in the words of howard stern’s dad, “shut up! stop being a moron!”
    just couldn’t help myself…

    mattymatty June 6, 2005, 9:29 am
  • To be fair, matty, John may not be a Yankees fan. But a moron? Without a doubt.

    SF June 6, 2005, 9:51 am
  • john:
    1) straight people can be “sodomists” too. as far as i know, sodomy is any sex that is not vaginal and between people of the opposite sex and can also be defined as non-procreative sex of any kind. so by that definition, pretty much everyone’s a sodomist.
    2) i don’t look at it as promoting sodomists so much as accepting people of all lifestyles. there are plenty of gay red sox fans and it’s not inconceivable that there are or have been gay red sox players. given the franchise’s bigoted track record in matters of race, it’s of the utmost importance that they show themselves to be open-minded in today’s day and age.
    3) the fact that you would refuse to make a disinction between the predatory molestation of children who cannot consent by people in a position of power and influence and sex of a nature you happen not to like between two consenting adults probably means that my first two points are lost on you.
    honestly, i’m tired of homophobic bigots whining about THEIR civil right to deny those of others. i’m tired of your plain old lack of tolerance being framed as concern for your children. personally, i think it SHOULD be forced on you. i think you SHOULD have to simply deal with the fact that homosexuals exist and are people worthy of acceptance, and that your kids are going to grow up in a different world, and there isn’t much you can do to stop that.
    if we’d respected people’s “right” to “disagree” with civil rights in the 60’s, blacks would still be drinking out of separate water fountains.

    beth June 6, 2005, 10:50 am
  • Yes, Bill you figured us out. We Yankee fans wish we were more like you SOx fans. We wish we could stop rooting for loser, “miserable pricks” like Jeter, Bernie, Mo, Jorgie, Matsui, Tino, etc. and we could root for respectable, humble geniuses like Schilling. You got us there. Where do I go to sign up?

    Battingly June 6, 2005, 11:23 am
  • Beth, you shouldn’t have bothered engaging “john” in any sort of discussion. He wasn’t interested in that. He just wanted to say stupid shit to piss people off.

    Nick June 6, 2005, 12:47 pm
  • “Sodomy” is not defined as any sex other than vaginal; it is usually between two males. It is strictly one type, of which I’m sure you’re aware. The right to disagree is simply a right, and nothing less….regardless of the issue. As far as forcing an individual opinion on another, that’s simply socialistic.
    I am a Yank fan since I can remember, even though I grew up in the South. And, honestly, I’m tired of reading all these references about their salaries….get over it…it is what it is…..”miserable pricks”….nope, just great talent pursuing the dream.

    BG June 6, 2005, 3:38 pm
  • I feel like a good definition of sodomy is in order, since a few people on here seem unclear about the definition. According to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary:
    Main Entry: sod·omy
    Pronunciation: ‘sä-d&-mE
    Function: noun
    1 : copulation with a member of the same sex or with an animal
    2 : noncoital and especially anal or oral copulation with a member of the opposite sex
    – sod·om·it·ic /”sä-d&-‘mi-tik/ or sod·om·it·i·cal /-ti-k&l/ adjective
    To sum it up, if you have sex with an animal, if you have oral sex with a member of the opposite sex, if you have anal sex with a member of the opposite sex, OR if you copulate with a member of the same sex, you are a sodomizer.
    Personally, I am a sodomizer. I bet you are too.

    spanky June 6, 2005, 6:31 pm
  • Nick, I’m sure she knows that. Still, somebody had to be the voice of reason, and beth volunteered. For which I, personally, am grateful. Thank you, beth, for saving me a heckuva lot of typing.
    Homosexuality=pedophilia. Hmm, sounds like somebody must’ve fallen asleep in sex ed.

    Sam June 6, 2005, 6:43 pm
  • Alright. That’s enough about Sodomy. We let these forums self-regulate, but henceforth this thread will be more closely monitored.
    Thanks.

    YF June 6, 2005, 10:51 pm
  • whew, I logged on to talk baseball and lookie what I found. I’m getting out of here before Delay logs on and starts forcing his opinion as well.

    Brad-SF June 6, 2005, 11:06 pm

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.